How To Win In Traffic (or any other) Court
I. Standing of plaintiff
For a plaintiff to have standing in court, there must be a violation of a right or personal injury. Governments were/are created to protect and maintain individual rights.
II. How to impeach (show incompetence to testify) a witness.
Usually, there is only one witness; the officer. The ticket is written testimony of the officer.
Jurisdiction of any court is limited to protecting individual rights. Therefore, for there to be controversy, there has to have been a violation of rights and injury or damages.
Hand the officer a copy of the citation(ticket). Ask the two following questions of the officer when he or she is on the witness stand:
1. Did you(officer) file a valid ‘Cause of Action’ against me(you)?
Usually the officer will say ‘yes’.
2. How many elements are in a valid ‘Cause of Action’?
Usually the prosecutor (state and officer’s attorney) will object.
Prosecutor: “Objection, calls for a legal conclusion, the witness isn’t competent to testify.” Or, “unable to testify.” Or, “This is outside the scope of the witness’(officer’s) expertise.” “He (or she) is not qualified to testify to these matters.’
The judge will always sustain the objection. Which is what you want. This means the witness is incompetent to testify or unqualified. The judge is required to strike all testimony (written [the ticket] and oral) of the impeached witness.
The court being a private, criminal (criminals with badges, black robes and suits) enterprise, this doesn’t automatically end or get the case dismissed. Only that the testimony of the witness has to be stricken by the judge.
III. The Impossibility of a Fair Trial
The Constitution for the United States of America guarantees a fair trial from an independent (unbiased) judge. This is a myth; propaganda; nothing but a public relations ploy.
Show conflict of interest by asking the judge a series of questions.
1. Am I entitled to a fair trial?
The judge will almost always answer ‘yes’; the public relations ploy, again.
2. Can I get a fair trial if there is a conflict of interest?
The judge, for obvious reasons, will say ‘no.”
A judge cannot be fair and independent if there is a conflict of interest.
3. The knock out question. To the judge: “Who do you represent here?” Or, “Who are you acting on behalf of?
Most judges will refuse to answer this question. Judges HATE to answer this because it will expose their scam. A fair trial is impossible.
‘’In all trial court proceedings, a judge shall disclose on the record information that the judge believes the parties…might consider relevant to the question of disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no actual basis for disqualification.”
Calif. Judicial
Canons 3(E)(2)
Judges represent the ‘state’, the pretended plaintiff. The judge is actually representing a party to the action against you!
IV. Corpus dilecti
The only thing separating a tort from a crime is that a tort is a violation of a legal right that belongs to the whole community as opposed to an individual. This is pure nonsense in and of itself.
Governments were/are formed, created, instituted, etc to protect and maintain individual rights.
Corpus dilecti is the body of facts of injury, loss or harm; an injury with causation. Without injury, loss or harm, there is no crime.
Statutes, ordinances, public law, acts, etc are not laws. No matter what do-gooder, ‘law’ makers say. If or when charges under any of these so-called ‘laws’, ask, ‘who was injured?” and ‘produce the injured party.”
References:
www.adventuresinlegalland.com
www.wtprn.com
No state project
Listen live every Sat. 2-4pm PST